Messyshaw Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 I know we keep away from politics here and with good reason. But a political announcement this weekend could have a direct effect on UKFRS budgets The Tories intend introducing a modern form of mandatory national service. The military aspect would be accessed via an assessment- therefore is voluntary The significant majority of 18 years will go down the 'mandatory voluntary' ( a worrying oxymoron) route to give 24 weekends service to agencies including the fire service With around 720,000 18 year old, that's gonna be a big ask Let's say after exemptions and those entering the military, 500,000 people remain to be placed on volunteer scheme Even if 5% choose the fire service (it's likely to be higher than that) that's 25,000 volunteers to be accommodated on weekends. How the hell can most UKFRS afford that? It's all a bit ill thought out unless extra cash is coming too. Plus it will need the Tories staying in No 10 so that makes it even more unlikely to happen 1 1 Link to comment
Cass Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 It's like the Tories are acting as if they're in opposition and coming out with even more ridiculous ideas than usual; knowing that they will not have to implement them... As for how would UKFRS cope...I doubt anyone has even thought that far ahead. Listening to an MP this morning on the radio, he wasn't even sure how it would policed; he said that it would not lead to criminal convictions if you refused! 😕 Link to comment
Kinmel Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 I know someone waiting for a recruit's course start date with the Army. However, due to serious accomodation shortages at barracks, you cannot start a recruit's course until your post-course accommodation is confirmed. Link to comment
Br9mp81 Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 Never going to happen,the money would be better spend on paying specials for the time they give and giving RDS a just reward for the commitment Link to comment
Messyshaw Posted May 26 Author Share Posted May 26 The plan also includes sending 18 years olds into cyber security roles for 12 months Taking into account it takes around 6 to 9 months to complete the type of security checking they would need, they wont have time to learn or do much with that 12 month placement 🤔 This policy must have been conceived at one of those No10 Friday afternoon parties - 🍾🍾🍾🍾 Link to comment
TandA Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 The cynic in me says that the training element will be downgraded and you will end up with a lot of “volunteers” doing jobs that previously were done by paid staff, thereby giving Rishi some savings that he can use to produce tax cuts for his mates. Effectively getting 18 year olds to work for nothing and fund abolishing inheritance tax or similar. 1 1 Link to comment
Jet Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Of course there is such thing as mandatory volunteering. Are you saying you've never been volun-told to do something? 😅 3 Link to comment
Messyshaw Posted June 13 Author Share Posted June 13 On 11/06/2024 at 16:13, Jet said: Are you saying you've never been volun-told to do something? 😅 I have been married for almost 40 years so have plenty of experience of being 'voluntold' 🙂🙂 5 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now